Warm Body Problem
Oversight on paper, absent in practice.

AI adoption advisory
Everyone has advice on adopting AI. Almost none of it explains why pilots succeed and production deployments quietly fail, or what to do about it. I help AI leaders find the real failure points and scale systems that hold up under real-world pressure, audits, and growth.
40+ production deployments audited · Forbes Tech Council · Creator of the HITL Maturity Model™
When the AI is wrong, someone has to catch it. In most systems I audit, that someone does not exist, is drowning, or has no way to prove they caught anything.
Oversight on paper, absent in practice.
Reviewers flooded past capacity.
Nothing to benchmark against.
The EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF both mandate meaningful human oversight but never define what "meaningful" looks like in practice.
Why this keeps happening
The AI industry has produced endless advice on models, prompts, and tooling. Almost none of it addresses the question that decides whether production succeeds: when the AI is wrong, does a qualified human catch it, and can you prove it? Companies that can’t answer that are running on an oversight illusion. Closing it starts with measuring something nobody has been measuring.
Here’s how to measure it ↓The Framework
Know your level in one working session. Leave with a ranked fix list.
A shared language for where an AI system actually sits, not where the deck says it does.
The system runs. Oversight is a story people tell themselves.
Humans intervene after something goes wrong, not before.
Review is scoped and routed, but capacity is the ceiling.
The model and the reviewer make each other better in the loop. Incidents drop; reviewer expertise compounds.
Oversight quality is measured, monitored, and improving: a number you can put in front of a board, a regulator, or a customer.
The HITL Health Index (HHI™) scores where you sit on this ladder, so progress is a number, not a feeling.
Proof
Advisory roles
“Su builds clarity where others see chaos. In 12 months, she helped a team reach $2M revenue with no sales team, cutting dev time by 40% and driving focused execution.”
“We took your recommendations seriously. Most of the jump is in Governance, the dimension you flagged, with real gains in human capacity and intervention quality too.”
“The maturity model gave me a practical framework to evaluate where my product stood and identify the highest-impact opportunities to improve. It helped me move beyond intuition, make more strategic product decisions, and build with greater confidence.”
Speaking
I speak on human oversight design at conferences, internal leadership offsites, and board sessions. Formats run from a 20-minute keynote to a 60-minute session with Q&A.
How we work together
Most clients start with a workshop or a diagnostic. Start wherever you are: every engagement ends with something you can use the next day.
Bring the model to your team, or start with the free material.
A working session for the team that owns your AI oversight. We run your live systems through the maturity model, name the failure modes you actually have, and leave you with a level and a ranked fix list. Delivered virtually or on site.
Everything in the half-day session, then a working design block. Your team leaves with drafted routing thresholds, escalation paths, and a reviewer capacity model for one live workflow.
Short lessons on human oversight design, published free. Start with Field Notes and the newsletter.
Direct engagement when the work is bigger than a workshop.
Structured evaluation, scorecard, level classification, regulatory gap analysis.
Book a diagnostic call →Confidence routing, escalation thresholds, feedback loops, agentic checkpoint gates.
Book a diagnostic call →Board-ready governance presentations, investor due diligence, regulatory roadmap.
Book a diagnostic call →The Product: Humyn Pulse
Frameworks tell you where you stand once. Humyn Pulse measures your HHI™ score and shows you exactly where oversight is weakest, so you can fix it before it becomes an incident.
Writing & Talks
Case studies and frameworks on AI governance, roughly weekly.